18 May 2013

Cry, my beloved country


(The Philippine Star) | Updated May 18, 2013 - 12:00am

This title of a book written by Alan Paton about the racial divide in apartheid South Africa and the unhappy lives of the people who lived in those times, is an apt title for the Philippines today.  Paton’s book differs with a single article the instead of the title of this column which is about my beloved country.
I think I can safely say that more and more Filipinos are disillusioned with the running of our country.
We have become the laughing stock of the world. And that includes businessmen (unless you are a crony) who one might think should be flourishing.  They too see the lack of direction. Recently we had an election that turned over the sovereignty of voters to Smartmatic-PCOS machines and there was nothing we could do about it. 
Some friends in the AES Watch  gave time and effort immediately after the 2010 elections so defects could be addressed in time for 2013. But to no avail. As far as Comelec was concerned, there were no defects. And I am not sure that the intimidated Supreme Court sans impeached former Chief  Justice Corona would be helpful.
When the issue of the source code came up, it hemmed and hawed with all kinds of excuses and when it claimed to have finally solved the problem no one was allowed to see it. The inference is that there was no serious intent to address the defects or problems pointed out by computer experts. The election was about how by using Smartmatic-PCOS the election of at least 6 senators friendly to the executive could be guaranteed. We shall see.
The heart of the problem is whether we are prepared to accept our disenfranchisement.
In Paton’s beloved country he wrote that the only hope for South Africa is “when white and black men decide that they are interested not in power or money but in the welfare of the country.” That, too is our only hope, not about white and black  but about the poor vs the rich and government vs. the people.
*      *      *
The  Opposition can rail and rant all it wants including going to the Supreme Court, but I am afraid the proclamation of the six senators is non-negotiable.  That is why the proclamation went ahead of time even if the official count was 30% incomplete. What better proof is there than it was the Palace itself that pushed that the proclamation be speeded up regardless of the chaotic conduct of election by these machines.
The Palace got its first wish – speedy proclamation of at least six but on the second ie that there should be no issue on the credibility of the elections will be more difficult. It presumes Filipinos ultimately come to accept the results of the election as they did in 2010 inspite of the questions and defects of that election. That is a big if..
*      *      *
In a way it is good that unqualified candidates are winning the elections. I think more and more will be convinced that the presidential system has not served the country well.  Indeed it is leading the country downhill. All the press releases extolling the amounts of hot money entering the country is calculated to deceive the public that all is well.
 Still we should not lament the election of Fernando Poe’s daughter or Jejomar Binay’s daughter.  They are merely following the script in a system that calls for a one man, one vote in a national elections for its national leaders whether the President or senators. Until and unless we restructure our political system we can expect more of the same or even worse. We would then be a failed state.
In the present system no matter how hard we try the numbers are against an intelligent vote. That is the first fact that we must acknowledge. It is inevitable that the huge majority of unintelligent voting will always overwhelm a small intelligent vote. So it is not about making clueless voters more intelligent to achieve better elections alone. It is also about restructuring our politics and governance so that the selection of leaders does not depend on money and popularity. What else do candidates have to do except sing and dance without a party platform to vote upon. There are no parties and  no programs to vote for even if they call themselves Liberals or UNA.
Nor is it surprising that money should count in such a set up. The problem of ignorant voters in the Philippines is not just about ignorance. Election in the Philippines is an industry. What are on sale are votes and offices for candidates.
*      *      *
As I have previously written about in this column we are wasting our time if we think we can “guard” an automatic electoral system. Once again let us cite how Federal Court of Germany ended all debate on defects and inefficiencies of automatic electoral system. It just forbade it and reverted  to the manual system.  
The automatic electoral system it said violates human rights because it removes the right of voters in favor of machines. It is a substitution that cannot be defended because the secrecy of computers and its programming is incompatible with the public nature of elections. And because voting is a public act voters should understand the process without specialist knowledge.
*      *      *
It is time that we look outside for help if we cannot get fundamental justice in a country that has now abandoned the rule of law. There has been a start with the petition lodged in the International Court of Human Rights but more can be done if we now join cause with such groups as Black Box Voting in the US.
*      *      *
Here is what a New York Times editorial said in May 1990 when the question of extending the lease for US bases in Subic Bay and Clark Field was being debated among both Americans and Filipinos. “Whatever strategic value the two US bases still possess would be more than negated if they come to poison the relationship between the two countries. ” That was in 1990 and then we had the Pinatubo eruption.
But today if it is true that the return of the bases is the US agenda being pushed through manipulated elections there would be a graver reason for a wider Filipino disenchantment with its alliance with the US.

MILF admits cheating happened in May polls | ABS-CBN News

MILF admits cheating happened in May polls | ABS-CBN News

10 May 2013

People's Manual Audit (T)


PEOPLE'S MANUAL AUDIT
UPANG MALAMAN NG SAMBAYANAN KUNG MAKATOTOHANAN ANG RESULTA NG PGBILANG NG PCOS, TINATAWAGAN ANG TAUMBAYAN NA GUMAWA NG SARILING PEOPLE'S MANUAL AUDIT (PMA).
ITO NA ANG TANGING PARAAN UPANG MALAMAN KUNG TAMA O MALI ANG PAGBILANG NG PCOS.
ANG PAGSAGAWA NG PMA AY DIREKTANG PAGKILOS NG TAUMBAYAN UPANG GAMPANAN ANG KANILANG TUNGKULIN AT KARAPATAN NA PANGALAGAAN ANG “SANCTITY OF THE BALLOT.”
BOTANTE KA MAN NI ______ (KANDIDATO A) O NI ______ (KANDIDATO B) SA PAGKA _______ (POSISYON), NAIS NATING LAHAT ANG MALINIS AT MAKATOTOHANANG HALALAN.
HETO PO ANG PROSESO NG PMA:
1. PAGKATAPOS BUMOTO, BIBIGYAN ANG BOTANTE NG BALOTANG PMA UPANG KULAYAN O I-SHADE.
2. IHUHULOG NG BOTANTE ANG BALOTANG PMA SA NAAANINAG NA DROP BOX NA MAY NAKATATAK NA PMA.
3. MATAPOS IHULOG ANG HULING BALOTANG PMA, BIBILANGIN ANG BOTO NANG MANO-MANO.
4. IKUKUMPARA NAMAN ANG RESULTA NG PMA SA RESULTA NG PCOS.
5. KUNG PAREHO ANG RESULTA, SAMAKATUWID TAMA ANG BILANG NG PCOS. KUNG HINDI, MAAARING MAY DEPEKTO SA SISTEMA O ELEKTRONIKONG PANDARAYA.
6. KUNG MAGKAIBA ANG RESULTA, DAPAT MANAWAGAN KAAGAD ANG SAMBAYANAN SA DEPED SUPERVISOR/COMELEC UPANG ISAMA ANG PRESINTONG MAY PROBLEMA SA RANDOM MANUAL AUDIT (RMA).
7. KUNG ANG PAGKAKAIBA NG RESULTA AY MAPATUNAYAN SA RMA, DAPAT MANAWAGAN KAAGAD ANG SAMBAYANAN SA DEPED SUPERVISOR/COMELEC NA IMBESTIGAHAN ANG “ROOT CAUSE” AT MAGSAGAWA NG “MANUAL COUNT” NANG AYON SA BATAS.
UPANG MAGING MALINIS AT MAKATOTOHANAN ANG HALALAN, TINATAWAGAN ANG MASS MEDIA NA SURIIN ANG BUONG PROSESO, NA MAGSISIMULA SA PMA.
SALAMAT SA INYONG SUPORTA AT NAWA AY PAGPALAIN NG DIYOS ANG ATING BANSA AT ANG ATING DEMOKRASYA.

People's Manual Audit (E)


PEOPLE'S MANUAL AUDIT
SO THAT OUR COUNTRY MAY KNOW IF PCOS RESULTS ARE RELIABLE, WE CALL ON THE CITIZENS TO CONDUCT THEIR OWN PEOPLE'S MANUAL AUDIT (PMA).
THIS IS NOW THE ONLY PRACTICAL WAY TO KNOW IF THE PCOS RESULTS ARE RIGHT OR WRONG.
THE CONDUCT OF THE PMA CONSTITUTES A DIRECT EXERCISE BY THE PEOPLE OF THEIR RIGHT AND DUTY TO SECURE THE “SANCTITY OF THE BALLOT.”
WHETHER YOU SUPPORT _______ (CANDIDATE A) OR ___________ (CANDIDATE B) FOR _________ (POSITION), WE ARE ALL INTERESTED IN CLEAN AND HONEST ELECTIONS.
HERE IS THE PMA PROCESS:
1. AFTER A VOTER CASTS HIS/HER BALLOT, HE/SHE IS GIVEN A PMA BALLOT TO SHADE.
2. THE VOTER THEN CASTS HIS/HER PMA BALLOT IN THE CLEAR DROP BOX MARKED PMA.
3. AFTER THE LAST PMA BALLOT IS CAST, THE VOTES ARE COUNTED MANUALLY.
4. THE RESULTS OF THE PMA ARE THEN COMPARED WITH THE RESULTS OF PCOS.
5. IF THE RESULTS ARE THE SAME, THEN THE PCOS COUNT IS CONFIRMED. IF NOT, THEN THERE IS EITHER A SYSTEM DEFECT OR ELECTRONIC FRAUD.
6. IF THE RESULTS ARE DIFFERENT, ALL CONCERNED CITIZENS MUST IMMEDIATELY CALL ON THE DEPED SUPERVISOR/COMELEC TO INCLUDE THE QUESTIONABLE PRECINCT IN THE RANDOM MANUAL AUDIT (RMA).
7. IF THE DIFFERENCE IS CONFIRMED BY THE RMA, ALL CONCERNED CITIZENS MUST IMMEDIATELY CALL ON THE DEPED SUPERVISOR/COMELEC TO INVESTIGATE THE “ROOT CAUSE” AND CONDUCT A “MANUAL COUNT” IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
TO ENSURE CLEAN AND HONEST ELECTIONS, WE CALL ON THE MASS MEDIA TO COVER THE ENTIRE PROCESS, STARTING WITH THE PMA.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND MAY GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY AND OUR DEMOCRACY.

05 May 2013

A blessing in disguise



The Smartmatic-PCOS election fiasco may be a blessing in disguise.  It has forced us to question the system through which we choose our leaders.
Comelec’s insistence that everything is ok and ready for May 13 is a lie. Why Brillantes is insisting that it’s all systems go, we read about PCOS machines that are missing and others are not working.
As for the source code, he has today said the source code can be reviewed but not the one for 2013, only the 2010. I wonder what he is coming up with.
Let’s accept the challenge. Smartmatic’s contract with Dominion Voting Systems ended in 2009. That is the reason why it could not make the necessary corrections on the 2010 elections.
I think his attention must have been called about the boo-boo he committed when he said “if there was no source code to review in 2010, why should it be required in 2013?” He is half-right insofar as there was no strong protest that there was no source code to review in 2010.
Moreover, Congress and the diplomatic corps led by the US Ambassador were bent on a proclamation before June 30. I still remember Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile’s warning to objectors “you don’t know what will happen if we do not have a president by the end of June”. That stopped the debates in Congress but even before the debates could be finished, the US Ambassador was on his way to Times Street to congratulate the new President-elect. Other ambassadors soon followed. End of story.

                                                       *   *   *

So Mr. Brillantes  — it is not true that no one complained about the lack of review of the source code in 2010. There were many complaints but these were stonewalled by the very institutions that should have protected the integrity of the elections.
It took time for computer experts to come up with comprehensive reports on the failed election. In Senator Ponce Enrile’s words you don’t know what will happen if we don’t have a president by June 30.

So it is only now that we have a clearer picture of what happened in May 2010. Despite these findings, Comelec renewed the Smartmatic-PCOS contract forcibly ignoring deadlines and rules on biddings. Comelec presumed that all that was needed was simply to brazen it out and use Smartmatic-PCOS again because there will be no outcry.
The electoral body miscalculated the anger that was slowly building up with the knowledge of just what happened in 2010. That is where we are now. Angry with 2010 and fearful of 2013.
*   *   *
Yet this Smartmatic-PCOS fiasco might be the catalyst needed to once and for all junk a system of politics and governance that promotes graft and elects incapable leaders. They become politicians and once elected enrich themselves. While attention has been focused on the flawed automatic electoral system, there was another concern being voiced out — and if we did vote, who are we going to vote for? More of the same. There are parallel movements that reject the qualities of candidates. I will mention only three that have lately caught wide attention: Senator Loren Legarda, Senator Chiz Escudero and senatorial candidate Sonny Angara. There are others.
I am not surprised that Senator Loren Legarda has bought a “swanky $700,000 condo in Park Avenue, New York City.” She has become used to a luxurious life — a house in Forbes Park, expensive cars, daring low-back couture gowns and food from very expensive restaurants delivered to her house. Are these the perks of a senator courtesy of unaudited funds?
Sen. Loren is an intelligent woman and she has a good staff that churn out praise err…press releases to justify her expensive lifestyle. Neither am I surprised that she tops the blasted popularity ratings.
Still I was shocked at how crudely she conducts herself. I know first hand that she organized a dinner in her house for the caucus of senators who would decide to vote as one to impeach  Chief Justice Corona the next day. According to reports, she already owned the Park Avenue flat she did not report but had the effrontery to vote vs. Corona for an incomplete SALN. OMG.
Ditto for Sen. Chiz Escudero who projects an image of the new generation of politicians of the country — bright and popular until we know what he has been about. He has been allegedly receiving billions of pork barrel while his province of Sorsogon languishes in poverty. What did he do with the public moneys? As for Heart Evangelista, that is his private affair.
The most disappointing for me is candidate Sonny Angara. I hope it is not true as alleged by reliable sources that he co-authored with his father, Senator Edgardo Angara the P3 billion Aurora-Pacific Economic and Freeport Zone (APECO) project in Aurora. This project has dislodged farmers and fishermen, all members of the Dumagat tribe. So desperate are the indigenous tribes, they are said to have walked two 350 km.-marches against the project. At present they are still walking for another.
The Dumagats allege that the ambitious 12,923 hectare ecozone-tourism project grabbed their ancestral lands and fishing grounds unjustly from them without due process and proper consultation, in violation of the “Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (RA 8371).
Then there is the Movement Against Dynasties (MAD), a civil society group that wants to put a stop to political dynasties. There are a number of well-known families that have appropriated the political space for their families for generations.
*   *   *
This column congratulates Red Cross Chairman Dick Gordon for taking a stand in the battle between Comelec and civic groups on Smartmatic-PCOS.
He has filed a petition for mandamus vs Comelec to the Supreme Court to allow the political parties to examine and review the source code. Finally, we have a candidate willing to contribute to the growing clamor against the Smartmatic PCOS automated electoral system that Comelec will use on May 13.
No one has seen this source code and as far as we know it is not available because its owner is Dominion Electoral Systems and it has been locked in a legal battle with Smartmatic-PCOS.
“The opportunity to review the source code is very important to ensure honest, clean and credible elections.” Gordon said.
He is the author of Republic Act No. 9369 that amended the Automated Election Law. The Comelec has no discretion on whether or not to allow the political parties to review of the source code, he said.
“The law is clear. Section 14 of the Automated Election Law says that the COMELEC “shall promptly make the source code of that technology available and open to any interested political party or groups which may conduct their own review thereof.”